a. …when they are deciding what projects to pursue: The research that I am aware of deals with autism from an “adversarial” viewpoint; that it is a defect that must be cured. However…
1. …autism is neurological in origin. Therefore, the only away that it can be accurately diagnosed is by neurological rather than behavioral analysis. Unfortunately, the scientific community is not in 100% agreement that a neurological exam, that is still considered experimental, enables doctors to accurately diagnose autism.
2. …because those of us who embrace neurodiversity would like more research into other aspects of autism that would benefit our lives. Even those who reject neurodiversity could benefit from any research that could help them live more fulfilling lives until a cure is found.
3. …much of the research involved with finding a cure for autism is to find a genetic marker that many researchers believe is the cause of autism. Since the genetic marker was discovered for Down’s syndrome, 92% of all children found with it have been aborted.[1] Any cure that is contingent upon the termination of autistic fetuses will be of no benefit to those of us who have already been born with autism. Those who are living with autism, and who want to be cured, need to make sure that someone is pursuing that cure. Otherwise, the autistic cure for those living with autism may never be found.
b. …about the consistency of their findings with our own personal experiences:
1. Some of the research findings that have been published are not 100% consistent with our personal experiences. This is not to say that these research findings are necessarily totally off base. We autistics might be able to share with the researchers some insights about our autistic experiences that they did not come across in their laboratory or clinical experiments.
2. At least one researcher engaged in unethical practices to find the results that were paid for in advance by an outside party with ulterior motives. Even if his findings could ever be confirmed by someone using proper scientific protocol, rewarding researchers who use unethical practices sets a dangerous precedence.
3. Some of the “treatments” that are being advocated, both in the realms of medical and psychological, are of grave concern to some of us autistics. Some of these treatments could be classified as “snake oil,” while others have side effects far worse than any problems that come from being autistic. I have not heard any discussion as to why the FDA has not approved the treatments when they are brought up at autism conferences. In fact, the advocates of these treatments fail to bring up the fact that the FDA has refused their approval.
c. …by providing them with an autism database for the purposes of statistical analysis and developing strategies for how to help autistics: This database could be accessed on line by anyone wanting a better understanding of autism at both a statistical and personal affect aspect. Information would be provided by autistics who possess the ability for self-advocacy, parents of autistics, teachers and anyone else who desires to provide observations about specific autistics that they know and care about.
d. …in order to come up with a complete list of agitates that effect many autistics as well as effective countermeasures that will bring relief to autistics and their loved ones who are effected by them: The most gut wrenching aspect of autism is watching them suffer from some discomfort that seems impossible for anyone to explain. These issues, as well as some of the “behavioral” issues that many autistics have, are often the result of them having an adverse reaction to something around them. Although this is a proven fact, no one has as of yet come up with a complete list of these agitates nor countermeasures.